On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Justin DeFields <justindefields@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I spoke with the Avago/PLX FAE, and they said that the PLX software > team that worked on this driver is no longer with the company, so they > cannot offer support :( > > I'm not sure there is going to be a good answer for this issue. > Hopefully someone here can help me evaluate the "/* paranoia */" code > to determine if/why/when it's necessary? > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Justin DeFields > <justindefields@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> It turns out that I had a filesystem issue on my target when testing >> my removal of the /* paranoia */ block. I thought I was writing the >> file to NAND, when in fact it was being written over NFS to my Virtual >> Machine!!! After resolving this issue, and with the removal of the >> paranoia logic, the transfer completes as expected very quickly and >> reliably (20/20 transfers completed successfully). >> >> Can anyone here help me determine if that paranoia loop is still >> necessary for the PCIE cards, or what the purpose of it was in the >> first place? >> Justin, Did you ever get anywhere with this? I have an ARM based board with a USB2380 on-board (-AA rev by the way) and gave it a try with the Linux 4.4 kernel today without any luck (I couldn't get g_serial, g_mass_storage, or g_ether to work for me). The USB2380 product brief I have states that it can be used with existing NET 2280/2282 software drivers with no change but of course at least the PCI ID's are missing. What patch/patches do you have thus far to add USB2380 support to net2280? Regards, Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
