Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 01:14:30AM +0200, Joe wrote: >> >> What format do you mean exactly? >> Which part of that document are you exactly referring? > > The sections about the signed-off-by line and the proper description and > subject lines :) > >> Nice to contribute at kernel improvement and learn how to >> collaborate, anyway my "patch" just adds a single line to >> the source file of "option" module... so I also would be >> happy if you could re-create the patch for me. > > Try it again so that you get proper credit for it. > I read paragraph "11) Sign your work" and rules about "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1": -------------------------------- then you just add a line saying Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> using your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ So, seems there's no way to maintain my real personal infos anonymous. Did I well understand or there's some workaround to post a patch with for example, invented Name Surname to prevent real ones to be public? No problem with post my real infos, but I usually prefer to rest anonymous, so I'd like to know if there are also "anonymous alternatives" to submit. Could you explain that a little better? In the meantime I will preapre a patch submission message trying to stay as closer as possible to "the canonical patch format". Thanks again for your suggests! Bye. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
