On Wednesday 09 July 2014, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 07:47:16PM +0200, Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Peter De Schrijver > > <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:44:17AM +0200, Olof Johansson wrote: > > >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 03:23:45PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > > >> > This branch moves code related to the Tegra fuses out of arch/arm and > > >> > into a centralized location which could be shared with ARM64. It also > > >> > adds support for reading the fuse data through sysfs. > > >> > > >> The new/moved misc driver isn't acked by any misc maintainer, so I can't > > >> take this branch. > > >> > > >> I saw no indication from searching the mailing list of that either, > > >> so it wasn't just a missed acked-by. > > >> > > >> I wonder if this code should go under drivers/soc/ instead? > > > > > > It's modelled after sunxi_sid.c which lives in drivers/misc/eeprom/. > > > Originally this driver was also in drivers/misc/eeprom/, but Stephen objected > > > and therefore it was moved to drivers/misc/fuse. I think that's the right > > > place still. > > > > I disagree, I think this belongs under drivers/soc. Especially since > > you're adding dependencies on this misc driver from other parts of the > > kernel / other drivers. > > > > There are several other drivers doing that already, eg: > > drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93cx6.c > drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c > drivers/misc/atmel_pwm.c I believe we have plans to remove the latter two. I don't know about the eeprom one. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
