On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:04:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > For those 2 domains we can find the necessary clocks and resets by parsing > > the relevant existing DT nodes for PCIe and gr3d. For clocks, this isn't > > even needed as we can always register some extra clkdev's to get them. There > > is no equivalent for resets so we have to parse the gr3d and pcie DT nodes, > > but that's not too bad I think. > > Even if we could really do this, at this point I don't see an advantage. > All that it would be doing is move to some subsystem that doesn't quite > match what we need just for the sake of moving to that subsystem. Having > a Tegra-specific API doesn't sound so bad anymore. > The advantage would be that we can use LP0/SC7 as a cpuidle state. Also system resume from LP0 can be faster as we potentially don't have to resume all domains at once. Cheers, Peter. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
