On Wed, Apr 19, 2023, at 23:38, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 2:35 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023, at 23:21, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 1:51 AM Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Marking something as `depends on OF_DYNAMIC`. (Not sure whether Arnd
>> > meant that for BCM2835_VCHIQ or BCM_VIDEOCORE).
>> > Perhaps try that?
>> >
>> >>
>> >> I'm a bit surprised as I didn't observe such a thing.
>> >> But I also don't dispute it - clearly my testing was inadequate.
>> >>
>> >> I'll try and dig a bit deeper into this one.
>> >> Perhaps starting with the report from the kernel test robot [3]
>>
>> I have this in my randconfig build tree, but it looks like I never
>> sent it out.
>
> What else have you got hidden up in there? ;)
> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Actually, I have fixes for all missing-prototype warnings
in my tree, just remembered that this one is part of my
longer series. I have about 150 patches that are already split
up and just need to be sent out, plus more that are currently
sitting in a combined changeset.
Arnd
