On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 2:35 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023, at 23:21, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 1:51 AM Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Marking something as `depends on OF_DYNAMIC`. (Not sure whether Arnd
> > meant that for BCM2835_VCHIQ or BCM_VIDEOCORE).
> > Perhaps try that?
> >
> >>
> >> I'm a bit surprised as I didn't observe such a thing.
> >> But I also don't dispute it - clearly my testing was inadequate.
> >>
> >> I'll try and dig a bit deeper into this one.
> >> Perhaps starting with the report from the kernel test robot [3]
>
> I have this in my randconfig build tree, but it looks like I never
> sent it out.
What else have you got hidden up in there? ;)
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ----
> From bb01f96d7dd66fc437302785f623a3ab323d486e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 11:33:52 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] staging: vchiq_arm: mark vchiq_platform_init() static
>
> This function has no callers from other files, and the declaration
> was removed a while ago, causing a W=1 warning:
>
> drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c:465:5: error: no previous prototype for 'vchiq_platform_init'
>
> Marking it static solves this problem but introduces a new warning
> since gcc determines that 'g_fragments_base' is never initialized
> in some kernel configurations:
>
> In file included from include/linux/string.h:254,
> from include/linux/bitmap.h:11,
> from include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
> from include/linux/mm_types_task.h:14,
> from include/linux/mm_types.h:5,
> from include/linux/buildid.h:5,
> from include/linux/module.h:14,
> from drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c:8:
> In function 'memcpy_to_page',
> inlined from 'free_pagelist' at drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c:433:4:
> include/linux/fortify-string.h:57:33: error: argument 2 null where non-null expected [-Werror=nonnull]
> include/linux/highmem.h:427:9: note: in expansion of macro 'memcpy'
> 427 | memcpy(to + offset, from, len);
> | ^~~~~~
>
> Add a NULL pointer check for this in addition to the static annotation
> to avoid both.
>
> Fixes: 89cc4218f640 ("staging: vchiq_arm: drop unnecessary declarations")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> index 90a3958d1f29..aa2313f3bcab 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ free_pagelist(struct vchiq_instance *instance, struct vchiq_pagelist_info *pagel
> pagelistinfo->scatterlist_mapped = 0;
>
> /* Deal with any partial cache lines (fragments) */
> - if (pagelist->type >= PAGELIST_READ_WITH_FRAGMENTS) {
> + if (pagelist->type >= PAGELIST_READ_WITH_FRAGMENTS && g_fragments_base) {
> char *fragments = g_fragments_base +
> (pagelist->type - PAGELIST_READ_WITH_FRAGMENTS) *
> g_fragments_size;
> @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ free_pagelist(struct vchiq_instance *instance, struct vchiq_pagelist_info *pagel
> cleanup_pagelistinfo(instance, pagelistinfo);
> }
>
> -int vchiq_platform_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct vchiq_state *state)
> +static int vchiq_platform_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct vchiq_state *state)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct vchiq_drvdata *drvdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
