On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 09:30:44PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:02:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > That's not something that it's particularly idiomatic to actually use in > > ACPI and you end up with the same namespacing problem assigning IDs so > > I'm not sure it makes life any better. > So what's the idiomatic thing to do in this case, allocate the first > free PNP ID now for DSPI controller on LS2085A, then another one for > DSPI on LX2160A later, etc etc? AFAICT yes, assuming you don't make it look like a PCI device and enumerate that way which is more how these things more normally end up getting done.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
