On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 05:47:44PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 03:23:12PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:47:58PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > { "NXP0005", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&devtype_data[LS2085A], }
> > Based on some other stuff I've seen with ACPI on NXP stuff it looks like
> > they're following the same scheme but only caring about that one SoC for
> > the time being.
> So, no argument about caring only about ACPI on one particular SoC for
> the time being, but there's a big difference between a solution that
> works for N=1 and one that works for N=2...
> Showing my ignorance here, but is there something equivalent to
> of_machine_is_compatible() for ACPI?
The NXP0005 is the ACPI equivalent of a compatible (comprehensibility is
not ACPI's forte) and they're tying driver data to it there.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
