On 11/13/2018 11:07 AM, Stefan Wahren wrote: >> Lukas Wunner <lukas@xxxxxxxxx> hat am 13. November 2018 um 09:07 geschrieben: >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote: >>>> On 08.11.2018, at 08:06, Lukas Wunner <lukas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> +#define BCM2835_SPI_FIFO_SIZE 64 >>>>> +#define BCM2835_SPI_FIFO_SIZE_3_4 48 >>> >>> I only have doubts about the naming FIFO_SIZE_3_4 because it describe >>> a fill level not a size. >> >> Hm, it's three quarters of the FIFO's size, so seems sufficiently apt? > > Just a thought because only from the define name i wouldn't think of three quarters first. > Since i don't have a better solution, please go on. Does this have to be a constant, or could we just go about defining a macro which computes any percentage of that value (or quarter, which ever is most convienent), e.g: #define BCM2835_SPI_FIFO_SIZE_PCT(pct) \ ((BCM2835_SPI_FIFO_SIZE * (pct)) / 100) That might be clearer and more future proof in case you want to implement a low watermark in the future? -- Florian