I generally go by WCAG 2.1 guidelines at the moment for a definition of 'accessibility'. Currently the only provider I see that almost fits this bill is GitHub. On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 01:39:33PM -0800, chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Indeed, but at some point you have to have a least common denominator > for accessibility. For me, that least common denominator would be > "usable from lynx". That's a very very low bar, and it covers just > about all of us. > > The fact is, fewer and fewer things on the web are willing to meet that > least common denominator. As a user, I've pretty much given up on the > text mode browser, even though I'll keep using them everywhere I can, > till the day I die. As a service provider, I'm committed to only > hosting services that are usable from a terminal. > > -- > Chris Brannon > Founder: Blind and Low Vision Unix Users Group (https://blvuug.org/). > Personal website: (https://the-brannons.com/) > Chat: IRC: teiresias on freenode, XMPP: chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
