Chris,
Who exactly is us?
I hope you realize how many millions of blind and vi individuals there are
in the world, all of whom use technology differently and have their own
preferences?
Speaking personally, it is profoundly frustrating, and counter productive
when the word accessible gets used as if it means interchangeable.
After all, there are unfortunately rather a few who believe Linux users do
not deserve access based on your generalized concept of us.
Just thoughts,
Kare
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, Chris Brannon wrote:
Jookia <contact@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
sourcehut is accessible now? Last I checked it lacks things like skip
links and titles for icons :\
Neither are a prerequisite or a blocker for a thing being accessible,
not by a longshot. Sourcehut has headings, which work just as well
(better?) than skip links. And we (me and another blind friend) don't
find the lack of icon titles to be a problem in practice for sourcehut,
either.
It may not meet technical definitions of accessibility, but I'd argue
that it's more usable for us than the competition.
--
Chris Brannon
Founder: Blind and Low Vision Unix Users Group (https://blvuug.org/).
Personal website: (https://the-brannons.com/)
Chat: IRC: teiresias on freenode, XMPP: chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
