One of those people once told me that you could write a driver, pretend speakup is a new device or something like that and find the serial port the same way the current 8250 drivers do. Is this nonsense, or is it something we could do and this would make speakup much more robust than it is now. Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > John G. Heim, le Thu 09 Oct 2014 15:04:06 -0500, a écrit : > > I once asked on the kernel developers list what the right way to > > access the serial port was. If speakup does it wrong, that implies there is > > a right way, what is that? > > "Doing it wrong" doesn't mean that the "right way" is already available. > The difficulty here is that the right way doesn't exist yet, even if the > kernel developers have an idea of how it would look like. It's a matter > of getting the time to do it. > > Samuel > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup
