Re: the push to get rid of CONFIG_VT in the kernel and the future of Speakup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:08:54AM -0500, John G. Heim wrote:
> Well, there is a significant difference between your problem and
> that which is solved with the header block on the motherboard. I am
> responsible for several servers that weren't bought at my request. I
> had nothing to do with the purchase of the hardware yet I have to
> keep them operating. I am going to say that is a fairly common
> phenomena in the sys admin world. Every time you switch jobs or even
> get a promotion, you are going to be responsible for computers you
> didn't spec out.

Naturally.

> So I think it would depend on why you want to use a hardware synth
> with your laptop. Is that a choice or something you absolutely have
> to do?

It's something I'd like to be able to do, but not strictly necessary.

Greg


-- 
web site: http://www.gregn.net
gpg public key: http://www.gregn.net/pubkey.asc
skype: gregn1
(authorization required, add me to your contacts list first)
If we haven't been in touch before, e-mail me before adding me to your contacts.

--
Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup





[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux