quick basic, maybe silly queston?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:25:59AM -0600, Glenn Ervin wrote:
> If it has been kept up, zipslack is a version that you can install on a 
> FAT32 partition.

I think it's dead now, though I could be wrong.

> Maybe you can install any version on a FAT32 partition.

I wouldn't recommend this approach, even if it could work. For
starters, you won't be able to set ownership and permissions on a
fat32 file system, and software running under gnu/linux, as well as
the distros themselves don't like that. Also, technically, zipslack
ran on umsdos, a unix file system running on top of msdos. I suppose
it would be possible to install and use a gnu/linux distro running on
umsdos, which would of course be on a fat/fat32 file system, but if
you wanted to do that, you'd have to be contented with using a 2.4.x
kernel, unless someone has ported umsdos to the 2.6.x tree, and I'm
just not aware of it.

Greg


- -- 
web site: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org
gpg public key: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org/pubkey.asc
skype: gregn1
(authorization required, add me to your contacts list first)

- --
Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHja+H7s9z/XlyUyARAsG6AKC+e+Xx3bl3/FZSbd3zkffA5wf20wCePHqx
mZhs/7MY4DObZiRT12JcX38=
=UPS7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux