Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:24:55 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, matz@xxxxxxx, gcc@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, X86 ML <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alok Kataria <akataria@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Kate Stewart <kstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-sparse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@xxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Zankel <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20181129131611.GC3070@nazgul.tnic>
References: <20181003213100.189959-1-namit@vmware.com> <20181007091805.GA30687@zn.tnic> <20181007132228.GJ29268@gate.crashing.org> <alpine.LSU.2.21.1810071534220.7867@wotan.suse.de> <20181008073128.GL29268@gate.crashing.org> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1810081105350.16707@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <20181009145330.GT29268@gate.crashing.org> <CAK7LNARmrdtyE7JRAdJH_zbfvD_cej+TGLh+5KfT20o538KUcA@mail.gmail.com> <20181129130718.GA3070@nazgul.tnic> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1811291408400.1827@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <20181129131611.GC3070@nazgul.tnic>
User-agent: Alpine 2.20 (LSU 67 2015-01-07)

On Thu, 29 Nov 2018, Borislav Petkov wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:09:25PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I'd be not opposed to backporting the asm inline support.
> 
> Even better! :-)
> 
> > Of course we still have to be happy with it and install the patch ;)
> > 
> > Are you (kernel folks) happy with asm inline ()?
> 
> Yes, I think we are:
> 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181031125526.GA13219@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

OK, Segher - can you ping the latest version of the patch please?

Thanks,
Richard.

References:
- [PATCH v9 00/10] x86: macrofying inline asm
  - From: Nadav Amit
- PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec
  - From: Michael Matz
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec
  - From: Segher Boessenkool
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec
  - From: Segher Boessenkool
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec
  - From: Masahiro Yamada
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec
  - From: Borislav Petkov

Prev by Date: Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v12 23/25] kasan, arm64: select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_SW_TAGS
Previous by thread: Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec
Next by thread: Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Newbies FAQ] [LKML] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]