On Thu, 29 Nov 2018, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 08:46:34PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > But, I'd like to ask if x86 people want to keep this macros.s approach. > > Revert 77b0bf55bc675 right now > > assuming the compiler will eventually solve the issue? > > Yap, considering how elegant the compiler solution is and how much > problems this macros-in-asm thing causes, I think we should patch > out the latter and wait for gcc9. I mean, the savings are not so > mind-blowing to have to deal with the fallout. > > But this is just my opinion. I'd be not opposed to backporting the asm inline support. Of course we still have to be happy with it and install the patch ;) Are you (kernel folks) happy with asm inline ()? Richard. > Thx. > > -- Richard Biener <rguenther@xxxxxxx> SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)
