Re: LLVM fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25 February 2018 at 19:56, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Dibyendu Majumdar
>> In some ways it is easier to post a single patch for sparse-llvm.c
>> that contains all the fixes - as then it can applied or removed easily
>> as a single change. Or I can post smaller patches if that is the
>> preferred approach.
>
> It would be best to separate the patch you depend on vs your own
> patches. How big is your change? If you have a link I can take a look.
>

I don't have one yet - I will need to prepare this as my version
cannot be directly applied to Sparse.

>
>> In some cases there are patches that are based on ones posted here by
>> Luc - so I am not sure how to get these across with the correct
>> attribution.
>
> The best solution would be have Luc send small git merge request for
> the LLVM patch you are depend on. Merge those first.
>
> Failing that. I can apply sparse patch from patchworks as well.
> It just more work for every one to go through that route.
>

Okay I will identify the specific patches I need. I will try to play
them in my copy / and try to then apply my changes on top. Hopefully
this way I can send patches that can be merged.

Regards
Dibyendu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux