Re: LLVM fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Dibyendu Majumdar
<mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a bunch of LLVM fixes in my project that is derived from
> Sparse. These fixes are more comprehensive than the fixes posted in
> this list - although in some cases they are derived from fixes posted
> here.
>
> I would like to submit the LLVM fixes from my repository - I am happy
> to back port them to Sparse.

Sure, very welcome.

> In some ways it is easier to post a single patch for sparse-llvm.c
> that contains all the fixes - as then it can applied or removed easily
> as a single change. Or I can post smaller patches if that is the
> preferred approach.

It would be best to separate the patch you depend on vs your own
patches. How big is your change? If you have a link I can take a look.


> In some cases there are patches that are based on ones posted here by
> Luc - so I am not sure how to get these across with the correct
> attribution.

The best solution would be have Luc send small git merge request for
the LLVM patch you are depend on. Merge those first.

Failing that. I can apply sparse patch from patchworks as well.
It just more work for every one to go through that route.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux