Re: LLVM fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25 February 2018 at 20:18, Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> In some cases there are patches that are based on ones posted here by
>>> Luc - so I am not sure how to get these across with the correct
>>> attribution.
>>
>> The best solution would be have Luc send small git merge request for
>> the LLVM patch you are depend on. Merge those first.
>>
>> Failing that. I can apply sparse patch from patchworks as well.
>> It just more work for every one to go through that route.
>>
>
> Okay I will identify the specific patches I need. I will try to play
> them in my copy / and try to then apply my changes on top. Hopefully
> this way I can send patches that can be merged.
>

Hi Chris, one of the patch sets I need are the ones where Luc added
type to several Sparse OP codes. These are in the series:

https://marc.info/?l=linux-sparse&m=149063626507168&w=2

I don't think Luc is able to resubmit these - are you able to apply
them somehow? These contain the OP_PUSH patch which you will need to
omit.

Thanks and Regards
Dibyendu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux