On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:42:19AM -0400, Christopher Li wrote: >> Hi Luc, > > Hi, > >> Thank you so much for the patch. >> >> Here is the kernel full allmodconfig running ssa-mini-v1 on my new >> compile server. On the new server the timing is very consistent. >> The variance of run to run is under 0.1 second. >> >> ssa-mini-v1: >> 1205.82user 463.65system 1:16.97elapsed 2168%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata >> 536216maxresident)k >> 0inputs+12824outputs (0major+132162996minor)pagefaults 0swaps >> 1206.35user 463.27system 1:16.95elapsed 2169%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata >> 536296maxresident)k >> 0inputs+12824outputs (0major+132156314minor)pagefaults 0swaps >> >> >> This is the rc5 as base line. >> 1173.42user 453.56system 1:15.21elapsed 2163%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata >> 238072maxresident)k >> 0inputs+12784outputs (0major+128858147minor)pagefaults 0swaps >> 1172.86user 453.53system 1:15.14elapsed 2164%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata >> 238076maxresident)k >> 0inputs+12784outputs (0major+128858804minor)pagefaults 0swaps >> >> So the ssa-mini-v1 is about 2% slower than the current rc5. > > I haven't measured myself, but I guess that is because this series also > includes the removal of simplify_loads(). > > I wonder what would be these numbers if you measured: > 1) r5 + removal of simplify_loads() 1170.54user 453.61system 1:15.05elapsed 2164%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 238104maxresident)k 0inputs+12792outputs (0major+128794771minor)pagefaults 0swaps 1172.00user 452.53system 1:14.96elapsed 2166%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 238076maxresident)k 0inputs+12784outputs (0major+128795134minor)pagefaults 0swaps > 2) r5 + sssa-mini-v1 (which includes the removal). 1205.84user 463.12system 1:16.84elapsed 2171%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 536300maxresident)k 0inputs+12824outputs (0major+132152193minor)pagefaults 0swaps 1204.59user 462.09system 1:16.77elapsed 2170%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 536132maxresident)k 0inputs+12824outputs (0major+132160134minor)pagefaults 0swaps > >> BTW, how do you want your patches to be merged? Assume there is >> some feed back. Do you want to come up with V2 V3 or have them merged >> to master then come up with fix up on master? > > If there is some reasonable needed changes I can make a -v2 > But I think that most changes can be done later as additional > patches once it's already in master. Sure. Speaking of which, can you do me a favor bump the -rc5 to finial? Just drop the "-rc5" part in Makefile. Let's release the 0.5.1 and start merging patches :-) Thanks Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
