On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> ssa-mini-v1: >>> 1205.82user 463.65system 1:16.97elapsed 2168%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata >>> 536216maxresident)k >>> 0inputs+12824outputs (0major+132162996minor)pagefaults 0swaps >>> 1206.35user 463.27system 1:16.95elapsed 2169%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata >>> 536296maxresident)k >>> 0inputs+12824outputs (0major+132156314minor)pagefaults 0swaps >>> >>> This is the rc5 as base line. >>> 1173.42user 453.56system 1:15.21elapsed 2163%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata >>> 238072maxresident)k >>> 0inputs+12784outputs (0major+128858147minor)pagefaults 0swaps >>> 1172.86user 453.53system 1:15.14elapsed 2164%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata >>> 238076maxresident)k >>> 0inputs+12784outputs (0major+128858804minor)pagefaults 0swaps >>> >>> So the ssa-mini-v1 is about 2% slower than the current rc5. >> >> I wonder what would be these numbers if you measured: >> 1) r5 + removal of simplify_loads() > 1170.54user 453.61system 1:15.05elapsed 2164%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata > 238104maxresident)k > 0inputs+12792outputs (0major+128794771minor)pagefaults 0swaps > 1172.00user 452.53system 1:14.96elapsed 2166%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata > 238076maxresident)k > 0inputs+12784outputs (0major+128795134minor)pagefaults 0swaps > >> 2) r5 + sssa-mini-v1 (which includes the removal). > 1205.84user 463.12system 1:16.84elapsed 2171%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata > 536300maxresident)k > 0inputs+12824outputs (0major+132152193minor)pagefaults 0swaps > 1204.59user 462.09system 1:16.77elapsed 2170%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata > 536132maxresident)k > 0inputs+12824outputs (0major+132160134minor)pagefaults 0swaps Interesting and strange. This doesn't really correspond to the numbers I have here. Not at all, in fact, but I have only some rough measurements. I'll look at that tomorrow or so. -- Luc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
