On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 07:46:25AM -0400, Christopher Li wrote: > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I personally find the Markdown format *much* closer to normal text > > Same here. But I know I am biased. > > > formatting in email, and I'd highly recommend using it. I'm not sure > > why the kernel picked reStructuredText, but I don't think there's likely > > to be a huge amount of cross-pollination between the two in terms of > > documentation. In particular, you're unlikely to want to borrow files > > from the kernel given the different license. > > Mostly just submitting-patches.rst for the Signed-off-by part. > For the coding style we can just point to the Linux kernel one. > > I think it is fine to have a few *documents* remain GPL in sparse. > It is not link to any source file. It is not a source file at all. > I don't think any one will nick pick the license detail on this. Purely procedural documentation seems fine, sure. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
