On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 05:17:14PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 06/14, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:55:17AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > On 06/14, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > + pm8901-regulators {
> > >
> > > I'd rather have regulators@8901 and regulators@8058. That way the
> > > node name is generic per ePAPR suggestions.
> >
> > But ePAPR requires reg= if you specify a unit-address part of the
> > node name.
> >
>
> It seems the ePAPR also leaves this open to interpretation
> because it states:
>
> "The binding for a particular bus may specify additional, more
> specific requirements for the format of reg and unit-address."
>
> but we haven't done anything formal for the RPM "bus" so far. I'm
> not worried either way, just a fun fact!
Latest dtc with warnings enabled (W=1) warns if you don't follow what
I quoted.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
