Re: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: dts: add L2CC and RPM with regulators for MSM8660

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/14, Linus Walleij wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi
> index a5a38820554a..51d3c9e70617 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi
> @@ -215,6 +215,95 @@
> +
> +			rpmcc: clock-controller {
> +				compatible	= "qcom,rpmcc-apq8660", "qcom,rpmcc";
> +				#clock-cells = <1>;
> +			};

This driver isn't merged yet, but ok.

> +
> +			pm8901-regulators {

I'd rather have regulators@8901 and regulators@8058. That way the
node name is generic per ePAPR suggestions.

> +				compatible = "qcom,rpm-pm8901-regulators";
> +
> +				pm8901_l0: l0 {};
> +				pm8901_l1: l1 {};
> +				pm8901_l2: l2 {};
> +				pm8901_l3: l3 {};
> +				pm8901_l4: l4 {};
> +				pm8901_l5: l5 {};
> +				pm8901_l6: l6 {};
> +
> +				/* S0 and S1 Handled as SAW regulators by SPM */
> +				pm8901_s2: s2 {};
> +				pm8901_s3: s3 {};
> +				pm8901_s4: s4 {};
> +
> +				pm8901_lvs0: lvs0 {};
> +				pm8901_lvs1: lvs1 {};
> +				pm8901_lvs2: lvs2 {};
> +				pm8901_lvs3: lvs3 {};
> +
> +				pm8058_mvs: mvs {};

pm8901_mvs?

> +			};
> +
> +			pm8058-regulators {
> +				compatible = "qcom,rpm-pm8058-regulators";
> +
> +				pm8058_l0: l0 {};
> +				pm8058_l1: l1 {};
> +				pm8058_l2: l2 {};
> +				pm8058_l3: l3 {};
> +				pm8058_l4: l4 {};
> +				pm8058_l5: l5 {};
> +				pm8058_l6: l6 {};
> +				pm8058_l7: l7 {};
> +				pm8058_l8: l8 {};
> +				pm8058_l9: l9 {};
> +				pm8058_l10: l10 {};
> +				pm8058_l11: l11 {};
> +				pm8058_l12: l12 {};
> +				pm8058_l13: l13 {};
> +				pm8058_l14: l14 {};
> +				pm8058_l15: l15 {};
> +				pm8058_l16: l16 {};
> +				pm8058_l17: l17 {};
> +				pm8058_l18: l18 {};
> +				pm8058_l19: l19 {};
> +				pm8058_l20: l20 {};
> +				pm8058_l21: l21 {};
> +				pm8058_l22: l22 {};
> +				pm8058_l23: l23 {};
> +				pm8058_l24: l24 {};
> +				pm8058_l25: l25 {};
> +
> +				pm8058_s0: s0 {};
> +				pm8058_s1: s1 {};

Just leave these out? RPM shouldn't be touching s0 or s1.

> +				pm8058_s2: s2 {};
> +				pm8058_s3: s3 {};
> +				pm8058_s4: s4 {};
> +
> +				pm8058_lvs0: lvs0 {};
> +				pm8058_lvs1: lvs1 {};
> +
> +				pm8058_ncp: ncp {};
> +			};
> +		};
> +

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux