On 06/14, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:55:17AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 06/14, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > +
> > > + pm8901-regulators {
> >
> > I'd rather have regulators@8901 and regulators@8058. That way the
> > node name is generic per ePAPR suggestions.
>
> But ePAPR requires reg= if you specify a unit-address part of the
> node name.
>
It seems the ePAPR also leaves this open to interpretation
because it states:
"The binding for a particular bus may specify additional, more
specific requirements for the format of reg and unit-address."
but we haven't done anything formal for the RPM "bus" so far. I'm
not worried either way, just a fun fact!
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
