Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 0/6] dmaengine: dw: Fix src/dst addr width misconfig

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 10:06:16PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Hi Andy
> 
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 09:50:48PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 03:25:35PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 09:29:54PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 9:51 AM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The main goal of this series is to fix the data disappearance in case of
> > > > > the DW UART handled by the DW AHB DMA engine. The problem happens on a
> > > > > portion of the data received when the pre-initialized DEV_TO_MEM
> > > > > DMA-transfer is paused and then disabled. The data just hangs up in the
> > > > > DMA-engine FIFO and isn't flushed out to the memory on the DMA-channel
> > > > > suspension (see the second commit log for details). On a way to find the
> > > > > denoted problem fix it was discovered that the driver doesn't verify the
> > > > > peripheral device address width specified by a client driver, which in its
> > > > > turn if unsupported or undefined value passed may cause DMA-transfer being
> > > > > misconfigured. It's fixed in the first patch of the series.
> > > > >
> > > > > In addition to that three cleanup patches follow the fixes described above
> > > > > in order to make the DWC-engine configuration procedure more coherent.
> > > > > First one simplifies the CTL_LO register setup methods. Second and third
> > > > > patches simplify the max-burst calculation procedure and unify it with the
> > > > > rest of the verification methods. Please see the patches log for more
> > > > > details.
> > > > >
> > > > > Final patch is another cleanup which unifies the status variables naming
> > > > > in the driver.
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Awesome! Thanks.
> > 
> > Not really :-)
> > This series broke iDMA32 + SPI PXA2xx on Intel Merrifield. 
> 
> Damn. Sorry to hear that.(
> 
> > I haven't
> > had time to investigate further, but rolling back all patches helps.
> > 
> > +Cc: Ferry who might also test and maybe investigate as he reported the
> > issue to me initially.
> 
> Ferry, could you please roll back the series patch-by-patch to find
> out the particular commit to blame?

Plus to that it would be nice to have some log/info/details/etc about
what exactly is happening.

-Serge(y)

> 
> -Serge(y)
> 
> > 
> > -- 
> > With Best Regards,
> > Andy Shevchenko
> > 
> > 
> > 




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux