Re: [PATCH v3] serial: stm32: Merge hard IRQ and threaded IRQ handling into single IRQ handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 06:50:34PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 1/12/23 18:09, Johan Hovold wrote:

> > Fair enough. And it's not obvious that the stable team should backport
> > patches that only concern PREEMPT_RT either (e.g. as parts of it are
> > still out-of-tree).
> > 
> > The stable tag is still missing from the final revision though.
> 
> Please pardon my ignorance, which stable tag is missing ?
> 
> Can you maybe just comment on the V4 and point this out to me ? I'll 
> send a V5 then.

It's gone from my inbox.

But as per Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst:

    To have the patch automatically included in the stable tree, add the tag
    
    .. code-block:: none
    
         Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    
    in the sign-off area. Once the patch is merged it will be applied to
    the stable tree without anything else needing to be done by the author
    or subsystem maintainer.

A Fixes tag only indicates which commit introduced a bug, not
necessarily that the patch should be backported to stable (even if
autosel is likely to pick it up these days).

Johan



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux