On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 12:13:15PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 04:03:12PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The value returned by an i2c driver's remove function is mostly ignored. > > (Only an error message is printed if the value is non-zero that the > > error is ignored.) > > > > So change the prototype of the remove function to return no value. This > > way driver authors are not tempted to assume that passing an error to > > the upper layer is a good idea. All drivers are adapted accordingly. > > There is no intended change of behaviour, all callbacks were prepared to > > return 0 before. > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Assuming you remove the spurious kasan change: It's already gone in my tree, see https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/ukl/linux/commit/?h=i2c-remove-void > Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
