Re: "No irq handler for vector" problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Holger,

On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, Holger Schurig wrote:
> > Yet another thing which would be interesting. Load the i915 module and run
> > the userland graphics stack. Open the serial port for read, which should
> > not result in any interrupts. Check /proc/interrupts for the number of
> > interrupts for the serial port,
> 
> Hmm, the 8250 driver will generate one interrupt even when just reading.

the one is ok. That's an initial TX empty or state change. Nothing to worry
about.

> > wait 10 seconds and check again. In theory the numbers should be the
> > same. My crystal ball tells me they are not.
> What I'm wondering is about the massive number of ERR interrupts ...
> 
> root@test:~# while sleep 1; do grep ERR: /proc/interrupts ; done
> ERR:      25786
> ERR:      25809
> ERR:      25837
> ERR:      25861
> ERR:      25890
> ERR:      25912
> ^C
> 
> This is specific to nolapic=1, with "noapic=1" the ERR interrupt number
> stays at 51. But I guess this is a red herring, too, because who runs
> his box with nolapic=1 in the first place :-)

Could you do the same test without nolapic please?

Thanks,

	tglx



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux