Hi Andy, just to be sure, you mean test separately this: guess this one: 8852 T Feb 02 Andy Shevchenko ( 47) [PATCH v1] serial: 8250_pci: Don't fail on multiport card class and this series: 8853 T Feb 02 Andy Shevchenko ( 70) [PATCH v1 1/8] parport: Add support for BrainBoxes PX272/PX306 MIO card 8854 T Feb 02 Andy Shevchenko ( 96) [PATCH v1 2/8] parport: PCI core handles power state for us 8855 T Feb 02 Andy Shevchenko ( 56) [PATCH v1 3/8] parport: Convert to use managed functions pcim_* and devm_* 8856 T Feb 02 Andy Shevchenko ( 49) [PATCH v1 4/8] parport: Don't shadow error codes in ->probe() 8857 T Feb 02 Andy Shevchenko ( 46) [PATCH v1 5/8] parport: Convert printk(KERN_WARN) to dev_warn() 8858 T Feb 02 Andy Shevchenko ( 39) [PATCH v1 6/8] parport: Switch to use module_pci_driver() macro 8859 T Feb 02 Andy Shevchenko ( 37) [PATCH v1 7/8] parport: Sort headers alphabetically 8860 T Feb 02 Andy Shevchenko ( 36) [PATCH v1 8/8] parport: Replace short License header by SPDX identifier right? I can do that if that's what you want, in the meantime, I've built 4.14.16 with all of them applied and it's almost perfect: all ports are detected, but there is gap in port numbers (but maybe it's not really problem of those patches?) dmesg output: [ 0.418944] 00:05: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4, base_baud = 115200) is a 16550A [ 6.535380] 0000:02:00.0: ttyS4 at I/O 0xe080 (irq = 18, base_baud = 921600) is a TI16750 [ 6.536495] 0000:02:00.0: ttyS5 at I/O 0xe088 (irq = 18, base_baud = 921600) is a TI16750 [ 6.537598] 0000:02:00.0: ttyS6 at I/O 0xe090 (irq = 18, base_baud = 921600) is a TI16750 [ 6.538663] 0000:02:00.0: ttyS7 at I/O 0xe098 (irq = 18, base_baud = 921600) is a TI16750 [ 6.539731] 0000:02:00.0: ttyS1 at I/O 0xe0a0 (irq = 18, base_baud = 921600) is a TI16750 # setserial -g /dev/ttyS* /dev/ttyS0, UART: 16550A, Port: 0x03f8, IRQ: 4 /dev/ttyS1, UART: 16750, Port: 0xe0a0, IRQ: 18 /dev/ttyS2, UART: unknown, Port: 0x03e8, IRQ: 4 /dev/ttyS3, UART: unknown, Port: 0x02e8, IRQ: 3 /dev/ttyS4, UART: 16750, Port: 0xe080, IRQ: 18 /dev/ttyS5, UART: 16750, Port: 0xe088, IRQ: 18 /dev/ttyS6, UART: 16750, Port: 0xe090, IRQ: 18 /dev/ttyS7, UART: 16750, Port: 0xe098, IRQ: 18 is it possible to skip those nonexistant ttyS[23] ports and have ports from the card as S1..S5? please let me know if you want me to perform more tests... BR nik On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 08:41:34PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 16:45 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 15:10 +0100, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > > > Perhaps, you at some point can provide a board data to for these > > boards > > to be enumerated automatically. > > Just have done this. It's a series of patches I Cc'ed you where first > basically should deprecate your script. > > Please, test it (and perhaps entire series). > > > > with proposed patch, it now works for 4.14 as well.. > > > > Be aware, it's not final version, I would ask you to test a new one a > > bit later. > > Just sent it as well, please, test separately. > > -- > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Intel Finland Oy > -- ------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 00 Ostrava tel.: +420 591 166 214 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: servis@xxxxxxxxxxx -------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpqljyHJy62R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
