> On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 10:09 +0000, ygardi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:22 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: >> > Am I missing something obvious here? Because ufs-qcom currently looks >> > pointless to me, and I actually see little reason to even have it in >> the >> > mainline tree. >> > >> >> we haven't uploaded yet the patch that binds qcom vops to the driver, >> but >> we will soon. > > Perhaps you could make that patch part of v2 of this series. I see > little point in this series without that patch. Perhaps someone else > still cares about it, but I'm not looking at it anymore. > fair enough. i will upload a V2 series soon. thanks for your inputs. > Thanks, > > > Paul Bolle > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
