On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 10:09 +0000, ygardi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:22 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Am I missing something obvious here? Because ufs-qcom currently looks > > pointless to me, and I actually see little reason to even have it in the > > mainline tree. > > > > we haven't uploaded yet the patch that binds qcom vops to the driver, but > we will soon. Perhaps you could make that patch part of v2 of this series. I see little point in this series without that patch. Perhaps someone else still cares about it, but I'm not looking at it anymore. Thanks, Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
