> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:22 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: >> By the way, as far as I can see, this (new) module can only be loaded >> manually (or via scripts). Is that what people want? > > This comment wasn't well thought through. So I hand another look at the > code of usf-qcom. > > I noticed that the single thing ufs-qcom exports is "struct > ufs_hba_qcom_vops". But that's unused in next-20150520: > $ git grep -nw ufs_hba_qcom_vops > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c:999: * struct ufs_hba_qcom_vops - UFS QCOM > specific variant operations > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c:1004:static const struct > ufs_hba_variant_ops ufs_hba_qcom_vops = { > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c:1016:EXPORT_SYMBOL(ufs_hba_qcom_vops); > > So it's not used by code outside of ufs-qcom.c. Probably because it > can't actually be used by outside code. It's not mentioned in any public > header and it's even static! > > Am I missing something obvious here? Because ufs-qcom currently looks > pointless to me, and I actually see little reason to even have it in the > mainline tree. > we haven't uploaded yet the patch that binds qcom vops to the driver, but we will soon. > > Paul Bolle > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html