Re: iSCSI request keep rejected by microsoft iSCSI target because of write_same check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey Vaughan,

This was the issue we worked with Microsoft on wasn’t it? You guys figured out it was fixed in their target in a recent release right?

On Dec 1, 2014, at 3:01 AM, vaughan <vaughan.cao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 12/01/2014 03:25 PM, jazz@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> I has some sproblem and only one ISCSI target - Microsoft SWT
>> I disable write_same for iscsi by patching kernel (3.17.0)
> This method is not good.  Below is the answer from Mike when I asked if
> we can disable write_same in the template before.
> 
> "If you wanted to disable commands you would want to do it per device or
> target at the scsi layer, because there are or will be iscsi targets
> that support it."
> 
> Also Martin suggests the target should return a check condition of
> ILLEGAL REQUEST if it doesn't support a specific command.
> It's a bug that only happens with Microsoft target, not others like tgtd.
> 
> 
>> 
>> Patch is simple add .no_write_same = 1 param, into scsi_host_template
>> struct.
>> 
>> file drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c :
>> 
>> static struct scsi_host_template iscsi_sw_tcp_sht = {
>>  .module= THIS_MODULE,
>>  .name= "iSCSI Initiator over TCP/IP",
>>  .queuecommand           = iscsi_queuecommand,
>>  .change_queue_depth= iscsi_change_queue_depth,
>>  .can_queue= ISCSI_DEF_XMIT_CMDS_MAX - 1,
>>  .sg_tablesize= 4096,
>>  .max_sectors= 0xFFFF,
>>  .cmd_per_lun= ISCSI_DEF_CMD_PER_LUN,
>>  .eh_abort_handler       = iscsi_eh_abort,
>>  .eh_device_reset_handler= iscsi_eh_device_reset,
>>  .eh_target_reset_handler = iscsi_eh_recover_target,
>>  .use_clustering         = DISABLE_CLUSTERING,
>> + .no_write_same= 1,
>>  .slave_alloc            = iscsi_sw_tcp_slave_alloc,
>>  .slave_configure        = iscsi_sw_tcp_slave_configure,
>>  .target_alloc= iscsi_target_alloc,
>>  .proc_name= "iscsi_tcp",
>>  .this_id= -1,
>>  };
>> 
>> 
>> суббота, 11 января 2014 г., 6:22:46 UTC+5 пользователь Vaughan Cao
>> написал:
>> 
>> 
>>    On 2014年01月11日 04:24, Mike Christie wrote:
>>> On 01/10/2014 02:09 AM, vaughan wrote:
>>>> On 01/10/2014 03:41 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
>>>>> On 1/10/14 12:11 AM, vaughan wrote:
>>>>>> I haven't figure out why it's rejected with "bookmark
>>    invalid"(9)
>>>>>> reason, rather than "command not supported". IMO "bookmark
>>    invalid" is
>>>>>> used when minor protocol conflict such as final flag not set
>>    with
>>>>>> non-write command. However, I haven't find error of this kind in
>>>>>> report_opcode, so I guess it's not supported on the target.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Is it possible to get a wireshark/tcpdump trace? It does not
>>    have to
>>>>> be during boot. We just need to see what commands are sent and
>>    the
>>>>> response the target is returning.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I forgot we know some microsoft iscsi target people. We can
>>    just email
>>>>> them with the trace to confirm what is going on with the
>>    target. The
>>>>> trace seems to be easier for them than them interpreting linux
>>    kernel
>>>>> logs.
>>>> I enabled debug_iscsi_tcp, here is a more detailed log in
>>    normal connection.
>>>> Does "conn error (1020)" mean it's target peer who disconnect the
>>>> connection at the same time of reject report_opcode?
>>> Yes.
>>> 
>>>> If it is, I think iSCSI boot failure can't be avoided without
>>    disable
>>>> write_same check on OEL.
>>> Yes, you are right. Due to how more distros do boot, iscsid will
>>    not be
>>> up and you will hang. If are talking about disablement though I
>>    think it
>>> should not be done at the iscsi layer. It should be some sort of
>>> white/black list at the scsi device layer or something like that.
>>> 
>>> However, I will ping Microsoft and cc you and we can see what is
>>    up for
>>> sure. Maybe we will get lucky and they will have a release with
>>    a fix on
>>> their side.
>> 
>>    Target:
>>       Windows Server 2008 R2 DataCenter
>>       Microsoft iSCSI Software Target: 3.3.16563.
>>    Initiator:
>>       kernel with write_same check in sd, such as Kernel
>>    3.11.10-200.fc19.x86_64  
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to open-iscsi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux