Re: [ATTEND]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi, UBI is not an FTL, but it implements a lot of things a decent FTL
> would also need to implement. And implementing FTL on top of UBI would
> be much simpler than on top of a raw flash (I assume you are discussing
> a flash?). UBI has it's own strong sides and limitations. Here I
> described a simple FTL on top of UBI (long time ago):

You going to be at LSF? Would love to talk to other people with
experience with the gory details of flash :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux