On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 12:48 -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, UBI is not an FTL, but it implements a lot of things a decent FTL > > would also need to implement. And implementing FTL on top of UBI would > > be much simpler than on top of a raw flash (I assume you are discussing > > a flash?). UBI has it's own strong sides and limitations. Here I > > described a simple FTL on top of UBI (long time ago): > > You going to be at LSF? Would love to talk to other people with > experience with the gory details of flash :) Unfortunately no :-( -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
