Re: Why using configfs as the only interface is wrong for a storage target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 02:44:09PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
> 	It's great that Nick has fancy tools to fly around the target
> configfs space, but that's all fluff for people writing and debugging

	I'm glad that Nick is excited about what configfs provides him
as a developer examining the system, but I think he goes overboard
extolling these virtues.  This distracts from the core discussion of
configfs as a method of communicating the configuration to kernelspace.

Joel

-- 

Life's Little Instruction Book #207

	"Swing for the fence."

			http://www.jlbec.org/
			jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux