Re: [RFC] relaxed barrier semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 05:09:52PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> Sorry, I can't follow you here. What was the load pattern difference 
> between the tests in the way how the backend device saw it? I thought, 
> it was only in absence of the cache flush commands (SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE?) 
> in the write through case, but looks like there is something more different?

The only difference in commands is that we see no SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE.
The big picture difference is that we also only drain the queue just
to undrain it ASAP, instead of keeping it drained over a sequence
of SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE + WRITE + SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE, which can make
a huge difference for a device with very low latencies like the SSD
in my laptop.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux