Re: [RFC] relaxed barrier semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 04:56:31PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> For a simpler device (a disk without support for ORDERED queuing) the 
> same meta-data updates would be:
> 
> 1. 1st journal write command
> 
> 2. 2d  journal write command
> 
> 3. 3d  journal write command
> 
> 4. The queue draining.

Which is complete overkill.  We have state machines for everything we do
block I/O on (both data and the journal), which allows us to just wait
on the I/O requests we need inside the filesystem instead of draining
the queue, or enforce global ordering using ordered tags.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux