Re: [RFC] relaxed barrier semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph Hellwig, on 07/30/2010 04:57 PM wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 04:46:12PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
I supposed, with write back cache you did the queue drain after
request(s) with ordered requirements, correct? Did you also do the queue
drain in the same places with write through caching?

Using the queue drains in both cases.  I can only imagine keeping the
queue drained over the cache flush instead of just a few small I/Os
has nasty side effects.

Sorry, I can't follow you here. What was the load pattern difference between the tests in the way how the backend device saw it? I thought, it was only in absence of the cache flush commands (SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE?) in the write through case, but looks like there is something more different?

Thanks,
Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux