On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:24:56AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 09:20 -0500, Mike Miller (OS Dev) wrote: > > sorry, I fat fingered the address first time around... > > > > Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:18:49 -0500 > > From: "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lkml-scis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Steve Cameron <scameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, tom.lawler@xxxxxx, > > iss_storagedev@xxxxxx > > Subject: [RFC] hpsa: addressing review comments > > > > I have a question about the hpsa driver we recently released. We've received > > quite a few comments, very positive overall. When we make the changes noted, > > i.e., rip out /proc, style changes, etc., do we submit patches for that? Or > > repost the entire driver with the appropriate changelog? > > Either is fine with me. Posting update patches is very useful to people > who want to see what changes have been made between versions. When we > iterate to a final version, then you can repost the whole thing (so it > can go into the tree as one to avoid bisection problems). > Thanks, James. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
