On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 09:20 -0500, Mike Miller (OS Dev) wrote: > sorry, I fat fingered the address first time around... > > Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:18:49 -0500 > From: "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lkml-scis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Steve Cameron <scameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, tom.lawler@xxxxxx, > iss_storagedev@xxxxxx > Subject: [RFC] hpsa: addressing review comments > > I have a question about the hpsa driver we recently released. We've received > quite a few comments, very positive overall. When we make the changes noted, > i.e., rip out /proc, style changes, etc., do we submit patches for that? Or > repost the entire driver with the appropriate changelog? Either is fine with me. Posting update patches is very useful to people who want to see what changes have been made between versions. When we iterate to a final version, then you can repost the whole thing (so it can go into the tree as one to avoid bisection problems). James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
