Re: Large amount of scsi-sgpool objects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> > As I said, I recommend that people do not receive those off-topic
>> > patches by default, only on demand.  (Because I sometimes work with -rt
>> > users.)
>> 
>> And as I said before, I missed to remove the patch before pushing out
>> the -rt tree. So I really do not need repeated advise on how to do my
>> work.
> 
> yeah. I dont think Stefan ever maintained a high-volume generic 
> tree before. Kibitzing from the sidelines always makes it seem 
> so easy ;-)

You could also take this "I recommend..." not as advice how to do your
work but rather as a /user request/ regarding the outcome of your work.

(But you know all that already of course; you also know what's best for
those who pull your trees.)
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= --== --=--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux