Re: Large amount of scsi-sgpool objects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 07:39 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Perhaps you could avoid putting such fixes into published 
> >> merge branches.
> [so that consumers of the trees use them only on demand]
> > 
> > Yeah, these commits are in none of the topic branches that are 
> > the git base of development, they are all already in a separate 
> > branch named "tip:out-of-tree".
> 
> So people should remember to retry without out-of-tree before reporting
> problems == remember to report against the development base.

I'll bite, how does a gut-fu white belt accomplish that?

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux