Re: Large amount of scsi-sgpool objects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Perhaps you could avoid putting such fixes into published 
>> merge branches.
[so that consumers of the trees use them only on demand]
> 
> Yeah, these commits are in none of the topic branches that are 
> the git base of development, they are all already in a separate 
> branch named "tip:out-of-tree".

So people should remember to retry without out-of-tree before reporting
problems == remember to report against the development base.

> That separate branch carries 
> assorted fixlets for various bugs we trigger in -tip qa. It 
> never goes upstream-wards, obviously. It's a bit like the 
> fixlets portion of -mm.

Great, if an eye is kept on issues & resolutions tracking --- like in
this thread, only with less confusion. ;-)
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= --== --=--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux