Re: [Open-FCoE] [PATCH 1/1] libfc: fix queue command rport checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James.Smart@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Christie [mailto:michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx]
So during a clean shutdown are drivers supposed to remove
the targets by
calling scsi_remove_target to remove the devices, then
remove the rports
through the class?
Or for the case where we are stopping a host (rmmod or single host stop like with fcoe), should drivers call

Yes - the steps below is what the drivers do today.  And this does all
work without failing the cache sync (unless something's changed recently
in the midlayer above us).

You mean if I do rmmod lpfc it should work today? I do not think it works anymore because in fc_remove_host we do this:

fc_remove_host()

        /* Remove any remote ports */
        list_for_each_entry_safe(rport, next_rport,
                        &fc_host->rports, peers) {
                list_del(&rport->peers);
                rport->port_state = FC_PORTSTATE_DELETED;
                fc_queue_work(shost, &rport->rport_delete_work);
        }


We set the rport->port_state to deleted before removing the target, so when the cache sync is sent later as a result of fc_rport_final_delete calling scsi_remove_target, the fc_remote_port_chkready checks in lpfc or qla2xxx or mpt's queeucommand will fail the command with DID_NO_CONNECT (fc_remote_port_chkready will


1. fc_remove_host()
This could be modified to cleanup shutdown targets then remove rports. We could then have a rport shutdown callback which the class could call and drivers could cleanup and shutdown the rport here before it is freed.

Is this related to your new scsi-target block code ?

No. It is unrelated. The block code patch is just to handle the case where when fc_timeout_fail_rport_io calls terminate_rport_io, and we will fail IO in the driver, but if there is IO in the blocked request queues we will just queue that back up until dev loss tmo fires. The problem there is because the fc_remote_port_chkready calls in the LLDs queuecommand will see the rport is blocked with a dev loss pending they will return DID_IMM_RETRY.

So if you have fast io fail tmo at 3 seconds and dev loss tmo at 120 seconds, we could get initial IO errors after 3 seconds, but IO in the blocked queue will not be sent upwards until 120 seconds later. With the block patches all the IO will be sent upwards after 3 seconds.


Yes - agree with your comment - we can change it so that it cleansup
the blocked target, then terminates the rport.
2. scsi_remove_host()

3. cleanup internal host resources.

4. scsi_put_host().



-- james




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux