> michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Oh yeah, I ccd linux-scsi for this patch and not others, > because JamesS > and them are not on fcoe devel list, and it seems like all fc drivers > fail the sync cache command. > > What happens is that we remove the rport which sets the rport state, > then the fc class removes the target. This causes the target and its > devices to be removed, which can cause a sync cache to be sent. But > because the the rport is not in the online state it will fail > the command. Well, excepting detachment paths, if we're tearing the rport down, it's because we've already lost connectivity to the target, so there's no way a sync cache would ever succeed. It's a suprise-removal scenario. -- james -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
