michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
4. fc_lport_destroy, fc_fcp_destroy ordering in fcoe_destroy_interface does not seem right. It looks like if we need to send a sync cache to the device when it is removed it will always fail.
Oh yeah, I ccd linux-scsi for this patch and not others, because JamesS and them are not on fcoe devel list, and it seems like all fc drivers fail the sync cache command.
What happens is that we remove the rport which sets the rport state, then the fc class removes the target. This causes the target and its devices to be removed, which can cause a sync cache to be sent. But because the the rport is not in the online state it will fail the command.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
