On 10/28/13 07:31, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Ping
Regards
Andrzej
On 10/07/2013 10:46 AM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 10/06/2013 10:27 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-10-04 19:16:56)
Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-09-30 03:11:41)
Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2013-09-16 07:33:45)
On 09/12/2013 12:50 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Well...I'm not sure changing to use macro is better or not at this
moment...
I think it is. ;) It's really less error prone to have symbolic
names
instead
of the plain numbers. The clock ids are defined in one place and it
is
more
clear what a clock is by looking at symbolic name. It's especially
annoying
to use plain numbers where are are many clock in a single node, like
10
or
more. What are you main concerns with this ?
I think having the symbolic names is a win for readability.
Hmm...since Mike who is a maintainer for ccf agrees with Sylwester's
opinion, so I agree. Actually, I had no strong objection on this but still
I'm not sure using macro is really better because sometimes the name
doesn't give readability really I think though.
Mike, can you give me your ack on clk stuff?
Yes, but I was thinking to take this change through the clk tree. The
new branch based on -rc3 will be published tonight.
Let me know if it causes problems for you for me to take it.
Uhm, I think dt changes can make ugly conflicts because of spread dt changing?
Sure, go ahead and take the patches then.
Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Mike
I can create patchset based on different git branch if neccessary.
Hi
Unfortunately, this changes would be merged after release of next rc1
because of too many conflicts with other DT changes in Samsung tree.
Thanks,
Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
