Mike Turquette wrote: > > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-09-30 03:11:41) > > Mike Turquette wrote: > > > > > > Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2013-09-16 07:33:45) > > > > On 09/12/2013 12:50 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > > Well...I'm not sure changing to use macro is better or not at this > > > moment... > > > > > > > > I think it is. ;) It's really less error prone to have symbolic > names > > > instead > > > > of the plain numbers. The clock ids are defined in one place and it > is > > > more > > > > clear what a clock is by looking at symbolic name. It's especially > > > annoying > > > > to use plain numbers where are are many clock in a single node, like > 10 > > > or > > > > more. What are you main concerns with this ? > > > > > > I think having the symbolic names is a win for readability. > > > > > Hmm...since Mike who is a maintainer for ccf agrees with Sylwester's > opinion, so I agree. Actually, I had no strong objection on this but still > I'm not sure using macro is really better because sometimes the name > doesn't give readability really I think though. > > > > Mike, can you give me your ack on clk stuff? > > Yes, but I was thinking to take this change through the clk tree. The > new branch based on -rc3 will be published tonight. > > Let me know if it causes problems for you for me to take it. > Uhm, I think dt changes can make ugly conflicts because of spread dt changing? - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |